Sjogrens World Forums

Sjogrens Topics => Living With Sjogren's => Topic started by: Sharon on February 12, 2017, 02:03:45 AM

Title: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 12, 2017, 02:03:45 AM
If you could get any treatment you wanted for your SJS (or its symptoms)
of those currently available
and cost/insurance approval/doctor's scripts weren't an issue,
which treatment would you choose?  :D
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Dawnmist on February 12, 2017, 03:53:29 AM
IVIG.

In Australia, IVIG is restricted to use for conditions that are life-threatening if not treated with IVIG. So despite IVIG having been successfully used overseas to stem the progression of auto-immune caused neuropathies, it is completely unavailable to me. Sjogren's has caused severe Small Fibre Neuropathy that extends from toes to groin, fingertips to elbows, and now across the mid-to-upper back, shoulders & neck. Pressure or brushing contact on the affected areas of skin cause pain - severe enough in the feet that I need a wheelchair if I'm walking more than about 50m, and in the last week I've had the unpleasant discovery that about 90% of my tops now trigger enough pain that I cannot wear them for a full day at work - they feel "too rough" and abrasive now causing the skin to burn severely by 3/4 of the way through the work day. :-S Sometime between the end of Sept and mid Dec last year, the damage also started to extend to the longer sensory nerve fibres in the legs, so they went from response being "well preserved" to it being "attenuated to absent" in nerve conduction tests. And despite all that, I still haven't been able to get any treatment aimed at trying to slow/stop the relentless progression of damage.

I've requested a referral to a neurologist in Melbourne who specialises in treating neuropathic pain, has a current research grant to investigate the effect of immune modification on chronic pain, and spent some time in London where she helped them put together their testing procedures for Small fibre neuropathy. She's the most likely person I can find with *actual experience* in the area to be able to help. The only problem is that it may take anywhere up to 8 months to get an appointment with her. The way things work is you send them your referral, the neurologist triage's the urgency and can decide to squeeze you in earlier if they feel it is needed, and then the office sends you the appointment time in a letter in the mail. I've submitted my referral and spoke with the office on the same day (which is why I know the default wait time to see her is 8 months), and am now waiting to find out what appointment time I'll actually be able to get.

I am really hoping that someone will let me do something before the damage hits the point that I cannot work anymore. I've been able to work around most of the pain so far by taking medication to deal with the "constant" base-load, and finding ways to avoid triggering break-through pain (e.g. typing on fingernails not fingertips, not using a computer mouse or holding things for very long, using the wheelchair/crutches, etc), but other than choosing very soft cloth I'm limited in how much I can work around pain triggered in the upper back & shoulders...I really can't go to work without clothes on!
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Joe S. on February 12, 2017, 07:40:00 AM
Arnie Palmer (tea and lemonade) for dry mouth sipping.
Marijuana for pain, blood pressure, and appetite. (This is the one I am not allowed. So I will use carrot Juice and reflexology.)
Acetyl-L-Carnitine and R-Lipoic Acid to repair damage to DNA
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Nymph on February 12, 2017, 09:42:24 AM
I am pretty happy with my Plaquenil and armamentarium of supplements. However, I think that my treatment of choice would be a vagal nerve pacemaker for inflammation and maybe a fecal transplant for my microbiome. Then maybe I could live drug-free?!?!?   ;D
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: WhatYouSjo on February 12, 2017, 03:34:39 PM
If money wasn't an issue, I would strongly consider the allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell treatment that has been researched (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3471521/l) in China.

There are a couple small molecule inhibitors that are currently in clinical trials that I would also be interested in.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: warmwaters on February 12, 2017, 05:13:49 PM
I'm going to more rules! And regardless of past experience, you'll have no side effects.


IVIG  - had to discontinue, but still feels like the right treatment.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 14, 2017, 02:26:34 PM
Dawnmist- that's awful that they won't give you the IVIG you obviously need!
Hope you get that appointment as soon as possible and that it leads to effective treatment!

Joe- I second your suggestion of medical cannabis!

Nymph- I've read they now have a vagal nerve stimulator that doesn't require an implant.
I too would love to try that. Last I checked it cost 30,000$!  :o

Warmwaters- Did the IVIG do anything positive for your other symptoms other than for neuropathy?

WhatYouSjo- Do you feel that the allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell treatment has been researched enough to actually render it safe?

I personally would like to try:
-One of the biologocal treatments available- either Orencia or Rituximab 
-Medical cannabis, preferably CBD
-Dextromethorphan therapy:
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jir/2013/125643/
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Jasper on February 14, 2017, 04:49:15 PM
I am happy with my Rituximab infusions because they have vastly improved my symptoms and I now have a life. I did not have a life prior to Rituximab infusions. I was barely existing.

However, I am open to any new treatments if they prove to be more beneficial to me than Rituxan, especially if they also reverse damage.

Because Rituxan infusions have been so beneficial for me, I would hesitate to stop them to try something else unless I was sure the new treatment was definitely going to help me more than Rituxan has helped me.

Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell treatment does sound promising. I wonder why it seems stalled. The article I read was from 2012. It seems like it should be advancing unless there is some reason we don't know about. Of course, there have been numerous studies demonstrating the efficacy of Rituximab in Sjogren's and yet, it is still not FDA approved for Sjogren's, although it is listed under the new Sjogren's treatment guidelines.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Dawnmist on February 14, 2017, 07:18:43 PM
My second choice would be Rituximab. But that's not approved for Sjogren's in Australia, so again I cannot have it unless I get approved through a Lupus clinic or develop Rheumatoid Arthritis as well. My Rheumy did try sending me to a Lupus clinic last year, but the head of the Lupus clinic appeared to decide that I was making things up and denied it. Her argument was that the QST testing (the ONLY tests available for small fibre neuropathy within Australia) was not "objective", so it was not admissible evidence of nerve damage occurring. Without it, there was "no objective evidence that Sjogren's was doing anything at all to me, only 'vague' complaints of pain, and thus there was nothing to treat" (her words). That was about 3-4 weeks before the pain in my feet triggered by walking reached the point where I couldn't get to work in a state *fit* to work without using a wheelchair.

IVIG will never happen without life-threatening organ damage or developing a life-threatening nerve-damage condition like Guilean Barre. I can at least accept that - it takes a *lot* of blood donations to make IVIG and we just don't have the population here to produce enough for more than life-saving purposes.

Rituximab didn't happen due to prejudice. That I have made a formal complaint about, but the hospital refused to review the previous decision.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Anastasia on February 14, 2017, 07:40:08 PM
I have to agree with Jasper.  Rituxan has been a wonder drug and has given me my life back.  I am not symptom free by any means and I often wish I could comprehend the illness better, but I am so grateful for a treatment that restored my quality of life.  I take Plaquenil also - 400 mg per day.  I'm not sure if it does anything, but am reluctant to quit it because it takes so long to work up to a therapeutic level.  I get 6 month checks with my ophthalmologist to monitor for problems. 
My second Rituxan infusion is tomorrow.  My insurance covers the whole cost. 
On Rituxan, I went back to work after a semester leave.  I teach high school Special Education and have no difficulty managing the demands of my day.  I have plenty of energy and feel good most of the time.  I do still have episodes of pain and inflammation in my tissue.  But it's manageable. 
I would also be very interested in the stem cell treatment.  I believe this will be the breakthrough treatment for autoimmune disease.  Currently, the most reputable research is occurring at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern under a Dr. Burt. 
I do wish that others did not have to have the constraints I read about here in terms of insurance and health plans.  I wish you all well!
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 15, 2017, 02:11:03 AM
Dawnmist- From my experience, when you need an additional diagnosis to receive proper treatment
it's necessary to find a rheumatologist who is on your side and wants you to get that treatment.
Look for someone who is caring, empathic and who has a heart.
I have had no success dealing with the inflated egos you may find in hospitals.

Jasper and Anastasia- Did Rituxan help with your sicca symptoms?
Problem is that the results of studies of Rituximab with SJS are mixed, with some showing promising results and others....not.
That's why it's not always approved for SJS patients.

As far as the stem cell research- yes, it's going real slow and I wonder why!
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Nymph on February 15, 2017, 03:07:47 AM
I would imagine that safety studies for stem cells may take a few years. Add that to the time to get through the bureaucracy and organize a study... Then it takes results awhile to be published after that.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: cccourt1942 on February 15, 2017, 06:38:33 AM
Sharon,
   Your final statement: "I wonder why."  If that is a leading statement, I got it.  And therein lies the big problem when hoping for stem cell research discovery -> treatment.
c3
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Jasper on February 15, 2017, 08:24:44 AM
Sharon .....

Rituxan has definitely improved my saliva flow. My saliva flow had improved quite a bit with CoQ10 but it improved even more with Rituxan. I still use CoQ10 in additoin to Rituxan. I never even think of water anymore. I don't get a dry mouth. I can go hours without drinking anything and I never need to carry water with me any more. This is a big change because I used to feel dry all of the time and I would get frantic without water.

I still use Restasis for my eyes and notice if I forget to put it in. However, my opthamologist said that my eyes lok the best they have ever looked in terms of cornea, moisture, glands, etc. so I think Rituxan is helping with my eyes as well.

My skin seems as dry as ever. I have never had vaginal dryness but I take hormones so I am sure that makes a big difference. I have never had constipation or dry bowels, so I have no experience on that topic.

All of the studies (except 1) that I have read show significant improvement with Rituxan. One has to read the entire studies, not just the abstracts, in order to see where the improvements are, when they occur, and how significant they are. The abstracts do not give the full picture. The abstracts focus on end points and if the end points are flawed, the results are flawed. The longest study, 120 weeks, showed significant improvement with Rituxan.

I think the biggest problem with so many of us having difficulty getting appropriate treatment is that doctors, including many/most rheumatologists, consistently dismiss our disease and its symptoms as a nuisance disease (with annoying symptoms) instead of treating us like they treat patients who have other rheumatological diseases. With so many of us disabled, I don't know how they can miss the debilitating effects of the disease, but they do. We do not have deformed joints or some other obvious deformity. The lab tests they use do not correlate well with our disease activity. We don't look sick. So, to most of them, we are not that sick and don't need treatment.  In the meantime, we just deteriorate while they are all twiddling their thumbs.

We need to get to the stage where we are taken seriously and treated aggressively at the onset so that we do not keep deteriorating and losing function. With RA, they are now trying to diagnose it very early, before any damage whatsoever occurs and even before most symptoms start, and treat it aggressively to prevent it from progressing to full blown RA. They are even treating autoimmune alopecia with big gun drugs and they treat psoriasis with big gun drugs. I empathize with people who have those diseases, but my point is, if alopecia is considered serious enough to treat, why isn't Sjogren's Disease considered serious enough to treat,. Alopecia does not disable a person, whereas Sjogren's Disease can and very often does disable a person.

I am very fortunate to have one of the few Rheumatologist who actually does take Sjogren's seriously and who does treat the disease.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 15, 2017, 11:13:08 AM
Jasper- So very well put! I could not agree with you more on all the points you made!
When I said the studies on Rituxan were inconclusive regarding SJS, I was relying on what rheumatologists have told me so far
when I inquired about the treatment. One went so far as to say she "didn't believe in it".  :o
I will try to read the studies in their entirety.

Nymph- True, though you have to wonder if the last study published on the stem cell treatment discussed was in 2012,
with nothing on further trials mentioned.

C3- True, unfortunately.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Jasper on February 15, 2017, 12:29:34 PM
Sharon, here is the link to the 120 week study. The article is excellent, but you can see just by looking at the graphs, tables, and figures that there is significant improvement with Rituxan.

http://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/ar4359


That Rheumatologist who "does not believe in it" is not only an ignorant Rheumatologist, but she is also doing a major disservice to any patients she shes.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 15, 2017, 06:06:55 PM
Oh thank you for this Jasper!  :D
Can you explain what they mean by: "ectopic lymphoid structures and germinal center-like structures"?
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: WhatYouSjo on February 15, 2017, 09:42:19 PM
There are several reasons that stem cell research has moved slowly. First, there is a high cost to such research, and pharmaceutical companies rarely want to invest significant sums of money without being guaranteed a return. In this case, they would want a patent on the specific stem cell therapy, and such patents are still a bit of a new area in law.

That leaves government research grants, but there have been issues there as well. In the United States, President Bush signed an executive order in 2001 blocking funding for large amounts of stem cell research for roughly 8 years. That is one reason countries like China moved to fill the void.

I would add that there is still significant research being conducted worldwide using MSCs as a treatment for a variety of illnesses and injuries. A quick Pubmed search on 'mesenchymal stem cells' returned 26602 publications in just the past 5 years. The researchers who published the 2012 study I linked to previously have been working on many projects, including tooth regeneration (2013) (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236104653_Periodontal_Ligament_Stem_Cells_Regulate_B_Lymphocyte_Function_via_Programmed_Cell_Death_Protein_1), lupus and scleroderma (2015) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631077/), and even regenerating salivary glands (2015) (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274319320_Generation_of_Bioartificial_Salivary_Gland_Using_Whole-Organ_Decellularized_Bioscaffold). All of these topics are relevant to SS patients, even if they aren't directly involving SS. Unfortunately, SS is rarely prioritized as a candidate for promising new treatments. We may be lucky to even have the 2012 study. That being said, with the money being poured into stem cell research, I think we can expect SS patients to benefit, even if we are forced to wait in line behind other, more prominent illnesses.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 16, 2017, 03:11:36 AM
Thanks for clarifying the matter WhatYouSjo.
I wish those researchers would have published a follow-up to their 2012 study instead of moving on to additional studies.
That gives the impression that they're somewhat "touch-and-go". 
Do you feel it's safe to try the treatment at the current stage it's at?
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: gurs on February 16, 2017, 04:38:36 AM
Dawnmist...

Because there is not one certain test for all autoimmune disease that is conclusive, you might want to see if your doc, or another doc can write the order for Rituxan for RA. Im sure most of us have some of this anyways. Medications can also interfere with blood tests too.
I think its a matter of how the doctor writes it? Does any of your joints hurt at all? I can barely bend my fingers now, but my labs dont indicate I have any RA either?

Hope you can find something to help.

Gursie
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Dawnmist on February 16, 2017, 05:27:46 AM
Quote from: gurs on February 16, 2017, 04:38:36 AM
Dawnmist...

Because there is not one certain test for all autoimmune disease that is conclusive, you might want to see if your doc, or another doc can write the order for Rituxan for RA. Im sure most of us have some of this anyways. Medications can also interfere with blood tests too.
I think its a matter of how the doctor writes it? Does any of your joints hurt at all? I can barely bend my fingers now, but my labs dont indicate I have any RA either?

Hope you can find something to help.

Gursie
Thank you Gursie.

The only times my joints have hurt have been due to tendinitis (except for one finger joint that got broken in a motorbicycle accident a decade ago). No swelling, no erosions visible on xray, nothing not fully explained by Sjogren's itself. I do get muscular and neuropathic pain, the tendinitis has been controlled for the last 21 months by anti-inflamatories, so no symptoms or evidence that my Rheumy could even *hint* at being caused by RA. Hence why he attempted sending me through the Lupus clinic last year. He has *tried* to work around the system. The only decision I've been annoyed with him about is his recent decision that Cellcept would be too risky to try for too little gain (and for not starting to look at treatment to slow the progression when he first suspected what was happening about 12 months earlier than he actually did). The specialists here seem to be a lot less gung-ho about intervening here than people report in the US. That said, when I first saw him I was starting to have suspicions that some of the pain I was experiencing may have been small fibre neuropathy, and he assured me at the time that in the 30 years he'd been practicing as a Rheumy he'd only ever seen 2 Sjogren's patients that had anything other than "dry eyes, dry mouth", one of them only mildly and the other one more strongly. He was trying to be reassuring. As a result, I *know* that I am presenting him with issues that he doesn't have experience with dealing with. Our population is so spread out in Australia that I'm not sure that there will be many Rheumies at all who *would* have experience with them - not unless they've spent several years working somewhere more populous like London. I know he's been in contact with Julius Birnbaum for advice to try to get me the best help he could. It's just that the advice he was given (use IVIG) is impossible to do in Australia.

General docs are not permitted to prescribe Rituximab here. It has to come from a Rheumy (or I think an Oncologist for certain types of cancer), and they have to get health department approval. Otherwise you as a patient are up for the entire cost yourself, which is just too darn much to pay. With health department approval the cost drops to the equivalent of a $38 co-pay per dose. Without approval, it's somewhere more like $10,000 per dose. He would have done them himself otherwise instead of having to try to send me through the lupus clinic (on the basis that "active" sjogren's is not that dissimilar to active lupus).
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Jasper on February 16, 2017, 07:15:18 AM
Sharon .....

This explanation is from an good article I found on the topic. The article is oretty detailed but it is well worth the read.

"Ectopic lymphoid-like structures (ELSs). Highly organized lymphoid aggregates that form in tissue sites that are not typically associated with lymphoid neogenesis."

"Ectopic lymphoid-like structures often develop at sites of inflammation where they influence the course of infection, autoimmune disease, cancer and transplant rejection. These lymphoid aggregates range from tight clusters of B cells and T cells to highly organized structures that comprise functional germinal centres. Although the mechanisms governing ectopic lymphoid neogenesis in human pathology remain poorly defined, the presence of ectopic lymphoid-like structures within inflamed tissues has been linked to both protective and deleterious outcomes in patients."

"Germinal centre.  Located in peripheral lymphoid tissues (for example, the spleen or lymph nodes), these are sites in which B cells proliferate and clones that produce antigen-specific antibodies of higher affinity are selected."

ELSs in autoimmunity and the emerging role of Epstein?Barr virus.
"The presence of ELSs with the appearance of fully functional ectopic germinal centres has long been described in the inflamed target organs or tissues of patients who are affected by autoimmune diseases, including the synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis, the meninges in multiple sclerosis, the salivary glands in Sj?gren?s syndrome ..... . In these clinical disorders, ELSs develop in response to disease-specific autoantigens, which also ensure the long-term maintenance of these structures within the inflamed tissue.The presence of ELSs in autoimmune conditions perpetuates  autoimmunity  towards  disease-specific antigens. In this respect, many of the regulatory mechanisms that govern tolerance within SLOs are not seen in autoimmune disease-associated ELSs. For example, in SLOs, autoantigen-binding B cells may be excluded from entering germinal centres and they lack responsiveness to CXCL13 owing to a downregulation of CXCR5. However, autoimmune disease-associated ELSs permit the entry of autoreactive B cells. This allows for the differentiation of the B cells into high-affinity autoreactive plasma cells that release disease-specific autoantibodies, such as anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in rheumatoid arthritis, and antibodies against the ribonucleoproteins Ro and La (also known as Sj?gren?s syndrome antigens A and B) in Sj?gren?s syndrome ..... "

https://www.roswellpark.edu/sites/default/files/pitzalis_et_al_ectopic_lymphoid_structures.pdf
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 16, 2017, 03:07:41 PM
Thanks Jasper,
Do you know if these ectopic lymphoid-like structures can be detected by MRI?
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Deb 27 on February 16, 2017, 03:46:41 PM
I honestly don't know what med I would choose to be honest. I think Jasper makes a good point that they look at us and twiddle their thumbs. If the lab tests aren't real high and joints deformed, all is good in their eyes.   I also have RA and am just on plaquenil. It gives me anxiety and depression. I had to cut the dose in half and now my joints hurt. They need medication that stops our immune system from destroying our saliva and other moisture producing glands.

I do like my current rheumy though, I think she is better than most. My first rheumy at Mayo clinic who diagnosed me with RA retired. I went there for a 2nd opinion and saw a young whipper snapper who said this was mostly Fibromyalgia and I needed to go to a class for fibromyalgia. Such an A*******. Again, I guess the 3 other rheumatologists I saw were wrong and two of them had practiced medicine longer than he had been alive. But, he knew better.......Right..........
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 16, 2017, 04:59:49 PM
I hate it when they throw fibromyalgia in our face.... >:(
I had one rheumy actually put in writing that he had "no doubt" that my suffering was actually caused by fibromylagia  ::)
Another diagnosed me with fibromyalgia just based on the fact that I brought a written list of all my symptoms to the appointment
(I just have so many symptoms I can't even recall them all during the few minutes doctors allocate me...)
Then he grabbed the list from me and wouldn't let me look at it!  :o
Finally I found one who told me that all my symptoms were obviously autoimmune especially with the positive ANA and that fibromyalgia is not diagnosed when someone has AI disease since our illness can account for all the symptoms attributed to fibro.

Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: WhatYouSjo on February 16, 2017, 07:51:55 PM
Sharon, MSC procedures generally have few short-term side effects. Research is still ongoing concerning long-term effects, with the primary concerns being cancer and infections (similar to biologic drugs). As far as I've seen, there is not yet enough data to say that any long-term risks exist. From one 2015 review (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4369496/):

In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated MSCs? pro- and anti-cancer and pro- and anti-infection effects nevertheless, most clinical trials have reported that MSCs-based therapy appears safe and has not been associated with serve adverse events. Together, due to MSCs? context-dependent potential to produce immune-modulatory factors they seem to be an ideal therapeutic tool for both cancer and infections.

There is a commenter on one of my blog posts (http://www.whatyousjo.com/2016/08/stem-cell-advancements-signal-a-possible-cure-for-sjogrens-syndrome/) who has reported receiving the therapy and believes there has been some improvement.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Jasper on February 17, 2017, 06:43:34 AM
Sharon ..... i am not sure if  ectopic lymphoid-like structures can be detected by MRI, but they are easily seen when a pathologist examines salivary gland biopsies.
Title: Re: Treatment of our choice
Post by: Sharon on February 18, 2017, 12:48:52 PM
WhatYouSjo- Thanks for the clarification. I do recall that comment on your blog and hope that
commenter continues to update on his progress!

Jasper- Thanks, that's what I thought.